Sergei Fedorov

Verified Timeline

Lore & Background

The source details specific financial figures for Sergei Fedorov during two distinct seasons. In the 1998–99 season, while playing for the Detroit Red Wings, he earned a salary of $14.5 million, which was the highest figure recorded in that year's list of top contracts. Later, during the 2003–04 season, Fedorov played for the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim, where his salary is listed as $10 million. The source notes that these figures are part of an unofficial estimation based on financial sites and generally do not account for bonuses or sponsor contracts.

In Their Own Story

The source provides a factual record of earnings rather than a narrative story. It establishes that in the 1998–99 season, Fedorov was among the league's top earners with $14.5 million while with Detroit Red Wings. By the 2003–04 season, he had moved to the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim, earning $10 million. The text highlights that these totals do not adjust for inflation or lockout-shortened seasons where applicable, though Fedorov's listed salaries appear as full-year figures in the provided data.

Reader's Guide

To understand Sergei Fedorov's financial profile according to this source, one must look at two specific entries. First, his time with the Detroit Red Wings in 1998–99, where he topped the list of top salaries at $14.5 million. Second, his stint with the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim in 2003–04, listed at $10 million. The source explicitly states that these lists exclude income from corporate endorsements and are estimates that do not perfectly account for bonuses. No data exists within this text regarding a Chicago Blackhawks tenure or subsequent career events.

Did You Know?

• Sergei Fedorov earned $14.5 million with the Detroit Red Wings in the 1998–99 season, making him the highest-paid player on that specific list.
• In the 2003–04 season, Fedorov's salary with the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim is listed at $10 million.
• The source lists these figures as estimates from financial sites and notes they generally do not take bonuses or sponsor contracts into account.